An excellent overview of types of bias and misclassification. Click here to consult the resource Resource quality according to evaluation criteria, range 0-32: 30
Week 5: BIAS by Harvard School of Public Health CONTINUE READING »
A moderate overview of the different types of bias. Click here to consult the resource Resource quality according to evaluation criteria, range 0-32: 24
Types of bias CONTINUE READING »
An excellent resource which links to 7 videos covering the key concepts of critical appraisal, the different study designs and use of CASP tools. Click here to consult the resource Resource quality according to evaluation criteria, range 0-32: 28
An introduction to critical appraisal CONTINUE READING »
A presentation of moderate quality. It covers the type of studies, performs an overview of guidelines, presents the steps of performing a critical appraisal and gives examples. Click here to consult the resource Resource quality according to evaluation criteria, range 0-32: 20
Introduction to critical appraisal CONTINUE READING »
A very good resource which describes the levels of performing a critical appraisal, the systematic review processes and appraisal and interpretation of main statistics. Click here to consult the resource Resource quality according to evaluation criteria, range 0-32: 25
Introduction to Critical Appraisal Published CONTINUE READING »
An excellent overview of key types of research studies, and terms including bias, confounding and levels of evidence. Click here to consult the resource Resource quality according to evaluation criteria, range 0-32: 30
Study Designs in Epidemiology and Levels of Evidence CONTINUE READING »
A very good overview of different study designs. Click here to consult the resource Resource quality according to evaluation criteria, range 0-32: 28
Classification of epidemiological study designs CONTINUE READING »
This article outlines types of ‘bias’ across research designs, and consider strategies to minimise bias. Click here to consult the resource Resource quality according to evaluation criteria, range 0-32: 28
Bias in research CONTINUE READING »
